Kerry Washington wants to talk to you about Mitt Romney, except Moveon.org has disabled the ability to leave comments on its Youtube video. Regardless, the cross-wearing Washington wants women to know that they should vote for President Obama so their “right” to kill babies is safeguarded. Too simplistic a stance? Disagree? Unlike Hollywood celebrities, I don’t go out of my way to terminate a good debate.

The great thing about the presidential election season is that without a doubt Hollywood liberals will come out swinging for the Democrat. Just three weeks before voters get to choose between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, Scarlett Johansson, Eva Longoria and Kerry Washington have taken part in MoveOn.org’s multi-million dollar campaign to convince you Mitt Romney will stop at nothing to control uteri.

As was the case with “Sesame Street,” the false dichotomy rears its ugly head once again. With PBS, the argument goes that if the government stops funding the very lucrative character known as Big Bird, then he will cease to exist. Now we’re told by The Black Widow and one of the Desperate Housewives that if the government doesn’t fund Planned Parenthood it too would disappear from the face of the earth — aborted, if you will — by the population at large.

Mitt Romney believes life starts at conception. If one believes that, it follows that the individual would want to protect the right to life of the most vulnerable among us (i.e., unborn babies). We can argue whether or not life begins at conception, but I’m reasonably sure that Ms. Johansson would have reservations about a woman who wants to be able to abort her child all the way up until contractions begin. If that’s the case, then she has tacitly agreed that the government has a vested interest in protecting the unborn — it’s really only a matter of deciding at which point in development it has the authority to step in.

Question for our Hollywood trio: Does it bother you that Vice President Joe Biden doesn’t question China’s one-child policy (the one where millions upon millions of females are slaughtered due to a cultural preference for men)?

What we ended up doing is setting up a system whereby we did cut by $1.2 trillion upfront, the deficit over the next 10 years. And we set up a group of senators that have to come up with another $1.2 to $1.7 trillion in savings or automatically there will be cuts that go into effect in January to get those savings. So the savings will be accomplished. But as I was talking to some of your leaders, you share a similar concern here in China. You have no safety net. Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you’re in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable.

Joe Biden indicates to our Communist friends that he doesn’t see life as precious — he sees it as a potential debt problem. Biden “fully understands” a policy that is predicated on the idea that humans are a form of economic punishment … sort of like President Obama.

It is telling that Hollywood celebrities don’t have time to raise public awareness for Pakistani girls like 14-year-old Malala Yousufzai, who was shot by the Taliban for wanting an education, but they do have time to tell voters Mitt Romney would “overturn Roe vs. Wade” (an odd assertion, since that would be something that would have to be done through the Supreme Court — the same body that couldn’t bring itself to declare Obamacare unconstitutional).

No, Ms. Longoria, I am not scared of men like Mitt Romney. My wife is not, either. However, I am very much afraid of liberal men like Bill Maher, who value death more than they value life:

HBO “Real Time” host Bill Maher says he’s “consistently pro-death” — and “not one of those people who thinks all life is precious.” Even dogs can create life, he said in an Oct. 7 interview on satellite radio. …

“I am for the death penalty, although I do believe in more DNA testing,” Maher continued. “My motto is, ‘Let’s kill the right people.’ I’m pro-choice. I’m for assisted suicide. I’m for regular suicide. I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving. That’s what I’m for.”

Joe Biden is cool with death, provided it allows the Chinese to pay their bills on time. Bill Maher is cool with death, provided it clears up traffic congestion just long enough for him to make that his 8:30 p.m. dinner reservation.

Barack Obama? Good question. I suggest listening to him discuss the Born Alive Act as a Senator from Illinois. My personal opinion is that a man who calls a baby a “fetus” after it’s been born is one confused individual, even more so than the vapid Hollywood starlets who offer their services for MoveOn.org attack ads.

14 comments

  1. Bravo my brother. Excellent post.

    “A person who condones the murder of innocent infants in the womb cannot be trusted to make any decision”..

  2. These bimbos want to “talk” about Mitt Romney? Wrong. They want to tell us what he believes, and then they want to go unchallenged, as demonstrated by MoveOn.org’s decision to block comments on the ad.

    The GOP wants to “redefine” rape? What the hell does that even mean? These people are sick, and while I would much rather prefer to be writing on debt and deficits and Islamic nut jobs in the Middle East, there was no way I could let this one slide.

    1. Yeah, they’re sick, not to mention nutty. These three women sound not unlike my own sister, who’s been whining on Facebook for weeks about the “War on Women,” the usual leftist tripe.

      If Hollywood really wanted to do something worthy, they’d bring attention to Malala Yousufzai and other women that are abused on a regular basis by the Islamic radicals.

  3. social conservatives don’t want young people to learn about sex and they don’t want young people to have access to contraception. no education and no contraception leads to more unwanted pregnancies, and social conservatives want to eliminate a woman’s right to terminate the pregnancy. then these people, who have the audacity to call themselves pro-life, want to make sure the people that need a safety net don’t have one.

    I know a young woman who is developmentally delayed, which is a PC way of saying mildly retarded. she got pregnant because a young man, who has the mental capacity of a 10 year old, had sex with her. unfortunately, this mentally retarded woman wants to keep the baby. I can only hope she has a miscarriage.

    you should support the right to terminate pregnancies, Doug, because then there will be less gerbils dependent on government largesse.

    1. I’m glad that you’re relegated to arguing statistical outliers involving sex between two mentally disabled people and ending with a sarcastic comment about one of my previous posts.

      That tells me, and probably any independents who wander to my site, that I’ve won this debate. Thanks.

      Here’s a link to ‘Big Government hooks human gerbils on handouts’. The one where I stress how all humans are spiritual beings of significant self worth, whose spirit is sapped by a learned government dependence.

      http://douglasernstblog.com/2012/10/08/big-government-hooks-human-gerbils-on-shiny-pellets/

    2. Side note to my readers: Years ago I was a substitute teacher, saving money for graduate school. I used to teach mentally disabled kids on a regular basis. The lessons they imparted to me about just how special life is, how healthy people like me take it for granted and the importance of treating everyone with dignity in respect changed me forever. I grew up a lot working and caring for them. They brought tears of sadness and joy to my eyes. I’d like to think God brought them into my life for a reason, and that because of the lessons I learned from them I have been able to better serve as an inspiration and an example to many, many others.

      I do not wish for one second that any of them would have been aborted.

    3. so you obviously support programs like head start, and you would obviously want to make sure the richest nation on earth could provide financial support for people who have mental disabilities, right?

    4. I support a safety net for those who need it. I don’t support what we have now in most cases, which is a safety hammock. I don’t support what people like President Obama want, which appears to be a safety swaddling blanket.

  4. who determines need? how should we separate the gerbils from those special kids who actually need it?

    and who is swinging comfortably in that safety hammock, Doug? Bill Clinton’s neoliberal welfare reform significantly attacked those lazy welfare queens and made them accountable. and Obama is positioning himself to do what Bush failed to do—going after Social Security.

    you spew talking points like a partisan hack. is that all you are, Doug?

    1. Wow, you sure do get a lot of mileage out of that gerbil reference. I must have really hit a nerve.

      http://douglasernstblog.com/2012/10/08/big-government-hooks-human-gerbils-on-shiny-pellets/

      Now I’m a “partisan hack”? All you know are personal attacks. Call me when you want to have a real discussion. I have better things to do with my time than to respond to your insults. I suggest reading the comments by “Me Again” for an example of how to handle yourself like an adult.

    2. no Doug, the problem is all you want to respond to are the personal aspects of my comments, because that’s a convenient way for you wiggle out of actually saying anything of substance.

    3. Nice try. I extend respect and civility to you, but the courtesy is not returned. Snide comments and ad hominem attacks are your trademark. When the introduction essentially is: “You’re an idiot, now answer me this …” it’s not going to be rewarded.

      I’ve had an ongoing back-and-forth with MeAgain for quite some time. We don’t see eye to eye on a lot of things, and have had pretty heated exchanges, but he’s almost always handled himself like a worthy intellectual sparring partner.

      I can not say the same for you.

  5. you’re a partisan blogger, self-described as bareknuckled, but really you’re just thin-skinned. sorry to waste your time.

    1. Like I said, I’ve had some epic debates with MeAgain. They’re there for everyone to see. You’re the one admitting you can’t have a discussion without resorting to personal attacks. Likewise, those are there for everyone to see. Bravo.

      Note: For readers who want to see just how incredibly patient I can be with guys like “Lizard19” (read into the avatar what you will, given the nature of his comments) just check out the following post:
      http://douglasernstblog.com/2012/10/04/romney-has-his-rocky-iv-moment/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s